Last updated: 2023-01-02
Checks: 7 0
Knit directory: gsmash/
This reproducible R Markdown analysis was created with workflowr (version 1.6.2). The Checks tab describes the reproducibility checks that were applied when the results were created. The Past versions tab lists the development history.
Great! Since the R Markdown file has been committed to the Git repository, you know the exact version of the code that produced these results.
Great job! The global environment was empty. Objects defined in the global environment can affect the analysis in your R Markdown file in unknown ways. For reproduciblity it’s best to always run the code in an empty environment.
The command set.seed(20220606)
was run prior to running
the code in the R Markdown file. Setting a seed ensures that any results
that rely on randomness, e.g. subsampling or permutations, are
reproducible.
Great job! Recording the operating system, R version, and package versions is critical for reproducibility.
Nice! There were no cached chunks for this analysis, so you can be confident that you successfully produced the results during this run.
Great job! Using relative paths to the files within your workflowr project makes it easier to run your code on other machines.
Great! You are using Git for version control. Tracking code development and connecting the code version to the results is critical for reproducibility.
The results in this page were generated with repository version e20e4a4. See the Past versions tab to see a history of the changes made to the R Markdown and HTML files.
Note that you need to be careful to ensure that all relevant files for
the analysis have been committed to Git prior to generating the results
(you can use wflow_publish
or
wflow_git_commit
). workflowr only checks the R Markdown
file, but you know if there are other scripts or data files that it
depends on. Below is the status of the Git repository when the results
were generated:
Ignored files:
Ignored: .Rhistory
Ignored: .Rproj.user/
Unstaged changes:
Modified: analysis/index.Rmd
Note that any generated files, e.g. HTML, png, CSS, etc., are not included in this status report because it is ok for generated content to have uncommitted changes.
These are the previous versions of the repository in which changes were
made to the R Markdown
(analysis/compare_vga_iterations.Rmd
) and HTML
(docs/compare_vga_iterations.html
) files. If you’ve
configured a remote Git repository (see ?wflow_git_remote
),
click on the hyperlinks in the table below to view the files as they
were in that past version.
File | Version | Author | Date | Message |
---|---|---|---|---|
Rmd | e20e4a4 | DongyueXie | 2023-01-02 | wflow_publish("analysis/compare_vga_iterations.Rmd") |
The vga step is an optimization problem. 1 iteration can already increase the elbo. Running till convergence will increase more elbo but is that necessary? does this benefit the overall fit in the long run?
I compare VGA 1 iteration vs convergence
res1000 = readRDS('/project2/mstephens/dongyue/poisson_mf/compare_vga_iterations/pbmc_3cells_vga1000.rds')
res1 = readRDS('/project2/mstephens/dongyue/poisson_mf/compare_vga_iterations/pbmc_3cells_vga1.rds')
plot(res1$fit$elbo_trace,type='l',col=2,lwd=2)
lines(res1000$fit$elbo_trace,col=4,lwd=2)
legend('bottomright',c('vga 1iter','vga converge'),lty=c(1,1),col=c(2,4))
res1$fit$elbo
[1] -4849876
res1000$fit$elbo
[1] -4852412
Not much difference. Running 1 iteration actually results in a slightly larger elbo.
res1$fit$run_time
Time difference of 1.158864 hours
res1000$fit$run_time
Time difference of 1.366542 hours
lapply(res1$fit$run_time_break_down,mean)$run_time_vga
[1] 2.162444
lapply(res1000$fit$run_time_break_down,mean)$run_time_vga
[1] 3.618856
1 iteration is much faster.
res1$fit$fit_flash$n.factors
[1] 8
res1000$fit$fit_flash$n.factors
[1] 8
library(fastTopics)
data(pbmc_facs)
### use three cells
cells = pbmc_facs$samples$subpop%in%c('B cell', 'NK cell','CD34+')
cell_names =pbmc_facs$samples$subpop[cells]
source('code/poisson_STM/plot_factors.R')
plot.factors(res1$fit$fit_flash,cell_names,title='vga 1 iter')
plot.factors(res1000$fit$fit_flash,cell_names,title='vga converge')
The last 3 factors are slightly different.
The 1 iteration version requires storing the full dense matrix V which can take huge memory space when the dimension is large. For example for a \(10^5\times 10^3\) dense matrix it takes > 16GB RAM.
The converged version can exploit the explicit relationship between optimal M and V so storing V is not required.
sessionInfo()
R version 4.1.0 (2021-05-18)
Platform: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu (64-bit)
Running under: CentOS Linux 7 (Core)
Matrix products: default
BLAS: /software/R-4.1.0-no-openblas-el7-x86_64/lib64/R/lib/libRblas.so
LAPACK: /software/R-4.1.0-no-openblas-el7-x86_64/lib64/R/lib/libRlapack.so
locale:
[1] LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 LC_NUMERIC=C LC_TIME=C
[4] LC_COLLATE=C LC_MONETARY=C LC_MESSAGES=C
[7] LC_PAPER=C LC_NAME=C LC_ADDRESS=C
[10] LC_TELEPHONE=C LC_MEASUREMENT=C LC_IDENTIFICATION=C
attached base packages:
[1] stats graphics grDevices utils datasets methods base
other attached packages:
[1] ggplot2_3.4.0 fastTopics_0.6-142 workflowr_1.6.2
loaded via a namespace (and not attached):
[1] mcmc_0.9-7 fs_1.5.0 progress_1.2.2 httr_1.4.4
[5] rprojroot_2.0.2 tools_4.1.0 bslib_0.2.5.1 utf8_1.2.2
[9] R6_2.5.1 irlba_2.3.5.1 uwot_0.1.14 DBI_1.1.1
[13] lazyeval_0.2.2 colorspace_2.0-3 withr_2.5.0 tidyselect_1.2.0
[17] prettyunits_1.1.1 compiler_4.1.0 git2r_0.28.0 cli_3.4.1
[21] quantreg_5.94 SparseM_1.81 plotly_4.10.1 labeling_0.4.2
[25] horseshoe_0.2.0 sass_0.4.0 flashier_0.2.34 scales_1.2.1
[29] SQUAREM_2021.1 quadprog_1.5-8 pbapply_1.6-0 mixsqp_0.3-48
[33] stringr_1.4.0 digest_0.6.30 rmarkdown_2.9 MCMCpack_1.6-3
[37] deconvolveR_1.2-1 pkgconfig_2.0.3 htmltools_0.5.3 fastmap_1.1.0
[41] invgamma_1.1 highr_0.9 htmlwidgets_1.5.4 rlang_1.0.6
[45] rstudioapi_0.13 farver_2.1.1 jquerylib_0.1.4 generics_0.1.3
[49] jsonlite_1.8.3 dplyr_1.0.10 magrittr_2.0.3 Matrix_1.5-3
[53] Rcpp_1.0.9 munsell_0.5.0 fansi_1.0.3 lifecycle_1.0.3
[57] stringi_1.6.2 whisker_0.4 yaml_2.3.6 MASS_7.3-54
[61] plyr_1.8.6 Rtsne_0.16 grid_4.1.0 parallel_4.1.0
[65] promises_1.2.0.1 ggrepel_0.9.2 crayon_1.5.2 lattice_0.20-44
[69] cowplot_1.1.1 splines_4.1.0 hms_1.1.2 knitr_1.33
[73] pillar_1.8.1 softImpute_1.4-1 reshape2_1.4.4 glue_1.6.2
[77] evaluate_0.14 trust_0.1-8 data.table_1.14.6 RcppParallel_5.1.5
[81] vctrs_0.5.1 httpuv_1.6.1 MatrixModels_0.5-1 gtable_0.3.1
[85] purrr_0.3.5 ebnm_1.0-11 tidyr_1.2.1 assertthat_0.2.1
[89] ashr_2.2-54 xfun_0.24 coda_0.19-4 later_1.3.0
[93] survival_3.2-11 viridisLite_0.4.1 truncnorm_1.0-8 tibble_3.1.8
[97] ellipsis_0.3.2