Last updated: 2020-03-06
Checks: 2 0
Knit directory: misc/analysis/
This reproducible R Markdown analysis was created with workflowr (version 1.6.0.9000). The Checks tab describes the reproducibility checks that were applied when the results were created. The Past versions tab lists the development history.
Great! Since the R Markdown file has been committed to the Git repository, you know the exact version of the code that produced these results.
Great! You are using Git for version control. Tracking code development and connecting the code version to the results is critical for reproducibility.
The results in this page were generated with repository version 3278a63. See the Past versions tab to see a history of the changes made to the R Markdown and HTML files.
Note that you need to be careful to ensure that all relevant files for the analysis have been committed to Git prior to generating the results (you can use wflow_publish
or wflow_git_commit
). workflowr only checks the R Markdown file, but you know if there are other scripts or data files that it depends on. Below is the status of the Git repository when the results were generated:
Ignored files:
Ignored: .DS_Store
Ignored: .Rhistory
Ignored: .Rproj.user/
Ignored: analysis/.RData
Ignored: analysis/.Rhistory
Ignored: analysis/ALStruct_cache/
Ignored: data/.Rhistory
Ignored: data/pbmc/
Untracked files:
Untracked: .dropbox
Untracked: Icon
Untracked: analysis/GHstan.Rmd
Untracked: analysis/GTEX-cogaps.Rmd
Untracked: analysis/PACS.Rmd
Untracked: analysis/SPCAvRP.rmd
Untracked: analysis/compare-transformed-models.Rmd
Untracked: analysis/cormotif.Rmd
Untracked: analysis/cp_ash.Rmd
Untracked: analysis/eQTL.perm.rand.pdf
Untracked: analysis/eb_prepilot.Rmd
Untracked: analysis/ebpmf1.Rmd
Untracked: analysis/flash_test_tree.Rmd
Untracked: analysis/ieQTL.perm.rand.pdf
Untracked: analysis/m6amash.Rmd
Untracked: analysis/mash_bhat_z.Rmd
Untracked: analysis/mash_ieqtl_permutations.Rmd
Untracked: analysis/mixsqp.Rmd
Untracked: analysis/mr_ash_modular.Rmd
Untracked: analysis/mr_ash_parameterization.Rmd
Untracked: analysis/nejm.Rmd
Untracked: analysis/normalize.Rmd
Untracked: analysis/pbmc.Rmd
Untracked: analysis/poisson_transform.Rmd
Untracked: analysis/pseudodata.Rmd
Untracked: analysis/qrnotes.txt
Untracked: analysis/ridge_iterative_splitting.Rmd
Untracked: analysis/sc_bimodal.Rmd
Untracked: analysis/shrinkage_comparisons_changepoints.Rmd
Untracked: analysis/susie_en.Rmd
Untracked: analysis/susie_z_investigate.Rmd
Untracked: analysis/svd-timing.Rmd
Untracked: analysis/temp.Rmd
Untracked: analysis/test-figure/
Untracked: analysis/test.Rmd
Untracked: analysis/test.Rpres
Untracked: analysis/test.md
Untracked: analysis/test_qr.R
Untracked: analysis/test_sparse.Rmd
Untracked: analysis/z.txt
Untracked: code/multivariate_testfuncs.R
Untracked: code/rqb.hacked.R
Untracked: data/4matthew/
Untracked: data/4matthew2/
Untracked: data/E-MTAB-2805.processed.1/
Untracked: data/ENSG00000156738.Sim_Y2.RDS
Untracked: data/GDS5363_full.soft.gz
Untracked: data/GSE41265_allGenesTPM.txt
Untracked: data/Muscle_Skeletal.ACTN3.pm1Mb.RDS
Untracked: data/Thyroid.FMO2.pm1Mb.RDS
Untracked: data/bmass.HaemgenRBC2016.MAF01.Vs2.MergedDataSources.200kRanSubset.ChrBPMAFMarkerZScores.vs1.txt.gz
Untracked: data/bmass.HaemgenRBC2016.Vs2.NewSNPs.ZScores.hclust.vs1.txt
Untracked: data/bmass.HaemgenRBC2016.Vs2.PreviousSNPs.ZScores.hclust.vs1.txt
Untracked: data/eb_prepilot/
Untracked: data/finemap_data/fmo2.sim/b.txt
Untracked: data/finemap_data/fmo2.sim/dap_out.txt
Untracked: data/finemap_data/fmo2.sim/dap_out2.txt
Untracked: data/finemap_data/fmo2.sim/dap_out2_snp.txt
Untracked: data/finemap_data/fmo2.sim/dap_out_snp.txt
Untracked: data/finemap_data/fmo2.sim/data
Untracked: data/finemap_data/fmo2.sim/fmo2.sim.config
Untracked: data/finemap_data/fmo2.sim/fmo2.sim.k
Untracked: data/finemap_data/fmo2.sim/fmo2.sim.k4.config
Untracked: data/finemap_data/fmo2.sim/fmo2.sim.k4.snp
Untracked: data/finemap_data/fmo2.sim/fmo2.sim.ld
Untracked: data/finemap_data/fmo2.sim/fmo2.sim.snp
Untracked: data/finemap_data/fmo2.sim/fmo2.sim.z
Untracked: data/finemap_data/fmo2.sim/pos.txt
Untracked: data/logm.csv
Untracked: data/m.cd.RDS
Untracked: data/m.cdu.old.RDS
Untracked: data/m.new.cd.RDS
Untracked: data/m.old.cd.RDS
Untracked: data/mainbib.bib.old
Untracked: data/mat.csv
Untracked: data/mat.txt
Untracked: data/mat_new.csv
Untracked: data/matrix_lik.rds
Untracked: data/paintor_data/
Untracked: data/temp.txt
Untracked: data/y.txt
Untracked: data/y_f.txt
Untracked: data/zscore_jointLCLs_m6AQTLs_susie_eQTLpruned.rds
Untracked: data/zscore_jointLCLs_random.rds
Untracked: explore_udi.R
Untracked: output/fit.k10.rds
Untracked: output/fit.varbvs.RDS
Untracked: output/glmnet.fit.RDS
Untracked: output/test.bv.txt
Untracked: output/test.gamma.txt
Untracked: output/test.hyp.txt
Untracked: output/test.log.txt
Untracked: output/test.param.txt
Untracked: output/test2.bv.txt
Untracked: output/test2.gamma.txt
Untracked: output/test2.hyp.txt
Untracked: output/test2.log.txt
Untracked: output/test2.param.txt
Untracked: output/test3.bv.txt
Untracked: output/test3.gamma.txt
Untracked: output/test3.hyp.txt
Untracked: output/test3.log.txt
Untracked: output/test3.param.txt
Untracked: output/test4.bv.txt
Untracked: output/test4.gamma.txt
Untracked: output/test4.hyp.txt
Untracked: output/test4.log.txt
Untracked: output/test4.param.txt
Untracked: output/test5.bv.txt
Untracked: output/test5.gamma.txt
Untracked: output/test5.hyp.txt
Untracked: output/test5.log.txt
Untracked: output/test5.param.txt
Unstaged changes:
Modified: analysis/ash_delta_operator.Rmd
Modified: analysis/ash_pois_bcell.Rmd
Modified: analysis/minque.Rmd
Modified: analysis/mr_missing_data.Rmd
Note that any generated files, e.g. HTML, png, CSS, etc., are not included in this status report because it is ok for generated content to have uncommitted changes.
These are the previous versions of the repository in which changes were made to the R Markdown (analysis/mr_missing_data2.Rmd
) and HTML (docs/mr_missing_data2.html
) files. If you’ve configured a remote Git repository (see ?wflow_git_remote
), click on the hyperlinks in the table below to view the files as they were in that past version.
File | Version | Author | Date | Message |
---|---|---|---|---|
Rmd | 3278a63 | Matthew Stephens | 2020-03-06 | workflowr::wflow_publish(“../analysis/mr_missing_data2.Rmd”) |
The idea here is to look at multiple regression with missing data, following up on the idea to use a pseudo-data approach.
Let γir be an indicator for whether Yir is non-missing (so 0 indicates missing), and nrs denote the number of non-missing observations in both r and s: nrs=∑iγirγis.
Let W denote the anologue of (1/n)X′Y in the full data case, based on the non-missing entries of Y. That is, Wjr:=(1/nrr)∑iXijYirγir Let R denote the empirical covariance matrix of the covariates: R:=(1/n)X′X
Let X′X(r,s) denote the matrix X′X computed using only those individuals i for which both r and s are non-missing (γirγis=1):
(X′X)(r,s)jk:=∑iγirγisXijXik
Let ˜V denote the matrix ˜Vrs:=Vrsnrs/(nrrnss).
We propose to make the following approximations:
A1: Treat the matrix W as approximate sufficient statistic, and do inference based on L(b)=p(W|b).
A2: X′X(r,s)≈nrsR.
With these approximations it can be shown that:
W∼MN(Rb,R,˜V) And we can use a transformation T such that TRT′=I to give: TW∼MN(TRb,I,˜V)
So we can solve the problem by fitting a MMR with outcome TW and covariates TR.
In the special case with no missing data this procedure will be exact.
We have an MMR with n observations in r conditions and r covariates. Y_{n \times r} = X_{n \times p} b_{p \times r} + E_{n \times r We allow that the covariances of the residuals may be correlated (covariance matrix V), so the rows of Ei⋅∼N(0,V). Assume for now that V is known.
This model can be rewritten in terms of the matrix normal distribution: Y∼MN(Xb,I,V). The log-likelihood for b is (up to a constant): l(b)=−0.5tr[V−1(Y−Xb)′(Y−Xb)]
Ignoring terms that don’t depend on b we get l(b)=−0.5tr[V−1(b′X′Xb−2Y′Xb)]+const so we can see that the summary data Y′X (or equivalently its transpose, X′Y) is a sufficient statistic for b (assuming X or X′X are known).
Let γir be an indicator for whether Yir is non-missing (so 0 indicates missing).
Now define W to be X′Y computed using only the non-missing entries of Y: Wjr=∑iXijYirγir
A first observation: O1 In the presence of missing data, W is not sufficient for b (even if γ,X are known).
[An exception: if every row of Y contains only one non-missing entry then W is sufficient]
As an aside, we have Observation O2: the way we compute the single-effect regression Bayes factors in susieR exploits this sufficiency, so they are not “valid” (ie not the actual correct BFs) in the presence of missing data.
The following simple example illustrates why W is not sufficient. Consider the case with r=2 and Y1,Y2 are completely correlated (V=11′), and let X be a column vector of all 1s, so we are just estimating the two means, which we will call (μ1,μ2).
Suppose the first observation is (Y1,Y2)=(0,0). This tells us that μ1=μ2 (because the complete correlation implies that Y1−Y2 is a constant and equal to μ1−μ2).
Now suppose we have a bunch of other observations where sometimes Y1 is missing, sometimes Y2 is missing, and sometimes both are observed (in which case we will know they are equal). Since we know μ1=μ2 from the first observation, and the Ys are completely correlated, we know Y1=Y2 with probability 1, so we can perfectly impute all the missing data. The mles are then easily computed based on these imputed data. But we can’t do this imputation if we only know the marginal sums of the observed Y1 and observed Y2.
This leads to a first Approximation A1: do inference for b based on L(b):=p(W|b). That is, pretend we have only observed W and not Y. Because W is not sufficient, this will lose some efficiency. But it should still provide reasonable inference and will simplify things.
TBD